Should You Read to Your Baby in the Womb
(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Periodical of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their get-go or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous ballgame rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is self-axiomatic from the information published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safe in Pregnant Persons." Just as disturbing every bit the data is the fact that the study authors evidently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth near vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News commodity, nosotros checked with our ain science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing then, we were able to confirm two things:
- Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their beginning or second trimesters.
- Yes, the written report authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to attempt to merits vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly condom. But the study data actually show quite the oppose.
Here's how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the 3rd trimester
Tabular array 4 from the written report, shown below, reveals that a full of 827 significant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (Yous accept to read the fine print below the table to meet this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their showtime or 2nd trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies hit the xx-calendar week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the table.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or 2d trimesters calculates to an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the 3rd trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have mayhap occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, past definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the incorrect denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" adding, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
Put another fashion, it is incommunicable for a woman who was vaccinated for the first fourth dimension during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous ballgame" in the first 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the commencement 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't exist included in the denominator used to summate the spontaneous ballgame rate.
The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they obviously tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it announced that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first twenty weeks of gestation, at least in this information set. (It's a small prepare of 127 significant women, and so we'd similar to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in club to get a more clear moving-picture show.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A elementary way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and l limes, with a science study request the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellowish fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly separate 50 into 100 because at that place are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, "50% of lemons are yellow" because it's 50/100.
Merely the other fifty pieces of fruit can't possibly be included because they're limes, not lemons. So the right math is 50/l, which means 100% of the lemons are yellowish. That's the right answer.
In this scientific discipline newspaper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were simply vaccinated in the 3rd trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since significant women aren't time travelers, they tin can't become dorsum in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either can't practise this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the earth with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its cadre promise: to offer "testify-based" conclusions to understand the earth around us.
Yet when four out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the starting time 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous ballgame charge per unit is only 12.6%. Why? Considering they're roofing up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, well-nigh likely.
In fact, the key writer of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that merits to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. Information technology raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same fault in other studies that ended vaccines posed no significant risk of agin events? For example, here's another study he co-authored: "Adverse events subsequently Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Arrangement (VAERS), 2011-2013."
That written report concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not place any new or unexpected condom concerns after TIV-ID."
Merely is that conclusion based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? Nosotros telephone call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study architect has made the aforementioned systematic mistake (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. Information technology wouldn't exist the first fourth dimension one author was establish to accept made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Albeit to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can't just accept bad math and phone call information technology "science" when the bad math doesn't bank check out.
Fasten protein injections into significant women an "barbarism," warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the mean time, information technology's clear that four out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at to the lowest degree, co-ordinate to the small data set we take so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) bear witness that covid vaccine spike proteins straight attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with man cells, it should exist no surprise whatever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does non characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more eighty% of unborn babies to exist aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You can hear him in his own words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97
All this means that live births may collapse by 3.2 1000000 over the next twelvemonth, in the United states of america lonely, if every meaning woman is vaccinated during the beginning 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is existence called a medical "atrocity."
The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are at present killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, centre attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine manufacture is at state of war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's state management arbiter once characterized human being children as an "ecology hazard."
This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes confronting humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated past a desire to aid humanity, but are at present clearly shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.
Learn more in today's listen-opening Situation Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
Hear a new podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html
0 Response to "Should You Read to Your Baby in the Womb"
Post a Comment